DIFFRACTION PROBLEMS IN FAULT INTERPRETATION*
- 1 September 1960
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Geophysical Prospecting
- Vol. 8 (3) , 381-388
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1960.tb01722.x
Abstract
Distinguishing between diffractions and true reflections is often difficult and may lead to misinterpretations. In the Molasse zone of Upper Austria, numerous faults were established by seismic surveying. Diffractions were observed at several antithetic faults but not at synthetic faults. As an example, a seismic record section of the Steindlberg structure is shown. The reflections from the base of Tertiary arid from the Cretaceous‐Jurassic contact run parallel over long distances, and so do the less important reflections lying above and between. If, contrary to the general trend, the reflection from the base of the Tertiary approaches the underlying reflection from the Cretaceous‐Jurassic contact, or if the latter diverges from the former, this is considered a criterion for a diffraction.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- STRUCTURAL AND SEISMIC DEFORMATIONS ALONG NORMAL FAULTS IN THE EASTERN VENEZUELAN BASINGeophysics, 1956
- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DIFFRACTION IN THE INVESTIGATION OF FAULTSGeophysics, 1952
- FAULT INTERPRETATION FROM SEISMIC DATA IN SOUTHWEST TEXASGeophysics, 1950
- COMPLEX REFLECTION PATTERNS AND THEIR GEOLOGIC SOURCESGeophysics, 1937
- VISUAL PRESENTATION OF ELASTIC WAVE PATTERNS UNDER VARIOUS STRUCTURAL CONDITIONSGeophysics, 1936