Investment-Specific Technology Shocks and Consumption
Preprint
- 1 December 2010
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Current business cycle models systematically underestimate the correlation between consumption and investment. One reason for this failure is that a positive investment-specific technology shock generally induces a negative consumption response. The objective of this paper is to investigate whether positive consumption responses to investment-specific technology shocks can be obtained in a modern business cycle model. We find that the answer to this question is yes. With a combination of nominal rigidities and non-separable preferences, the consumption response is positive for general parameterisations of the model.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- International business cycles and the relative price of investment goodsCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 2011
- Nonseparable Preferences, Frisch Labor Supply, and the Consumption Multiplier of Government Spending: One Solution to a Fiscal Policy PuzzleJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2011
- Investment Shocks and Macroeconomic Co-MovementSSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
- Labor Supply Heterogeneity and Macroeconomic Co-movementPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2009
- Sticky wages and sectoral labor comovementJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2009
- The Dynamic Effects of Neutral and Investment‐Specific Technology ShocksJournal of Political Economy, 2006
- Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary PolicyJournal of Political Economy, 2005
- Firm-Specific Capital, Nominal Rigidities and the Business CyclePublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2005
- Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky PricesJournal of Political Economy, 2004
- Time-Separable Preferences and Intertemporal-Substitution Models of Business CyclesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1984