Reproducibility of Genucom knee analysis system testing
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 18 (4) , 387-395
- https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659001800410
Abstract
The Genucom knee analysis system was studied to determine the reproducibility of test results. In the first phase of the study we investigated the reproducibility of anterior/posterior stress tests at 30° and 90° of flexion and varus/valgus stress tests at 20° of flexion in 10 control subjects during three seatings on 3 sep arate days. In the second phase we studied the effect of errors in the digitization procedure (a part of the patient installation process) on anterior/posterior trans lation measurements. In the third phase we studied the reproducibility of a battery of tests in patients with chronic unilateral ACL deficient knees. The test battery was repeated 8 times on each knee on 6 separate days. In Phase I, analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between tests within a single seating. The day-to-day variance of all subjects was not significant, but we found a significant interaction between day and subject which was due to significant day-to-day differ ences in individual subjects. We found in Phase II that changing the location of the tibial joint line digitization points in the anterior/ posterior or proximal/distal direction affected anterior/ posterior translation measurements. Effects were larger at 30° of flexion than at 90° and when both the medial and lateral points were moved. Movement of the femoral condylar points resulted in a similar pattern of effects. In Phase III, although we found significant differences between our two examiners, there were no significant intraexaminer test-to-test (within seating) effects. Ad ditionally, while there was no significant day-to-day variance overall, we found a significant interaction be tween day and subject. This was due to significant day- to-day differences in individual subjects. The results indicate that since measurements vary from day-to-day, care must be taken in interpreting the meaning of a single measurement or even of repeated measurements made within a single seating. We advise meticulous care in the digitization procedure, diligence in assuring patient relaxation, and attention to detail throughout.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Repeatability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in a normal populationThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1990
- Reliability of Force/Displacement Measures in a Clinical Device Designed to Measure Ligamentous Laxity at the KneeJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1989
- Preoperative instrumented testing of anterior and posterior knee laxityThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1989
- MEASUREMENT OF KNEE LAXITY USING THE GENUCOM ANALYSIS SYSTEMMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1989
- Objective knee evaluation using the Genucom Knee Analysis SystemThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1987
- Measurement of anterior instability of the knee. A new apparatus for clinical testingThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1987
- Accuracy and reproducibility of instrumented knee‐drawer testsJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1987
- An in vivo biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. Roentgenographic measurement technique, stress machine, and stable population.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1981
- In vivo knee stability. A quantitative assessment using an instrumented clinical testing apparatus.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1978
- Stress Radiographical Measurement of the Anteroposterior, Medial and Lateral Stability of the Knee JointActa Orthopaedica, 1976