The effects of various thicknesses of chemical protective gloves on manual dexterity
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 36 (6) , 687-696
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139308967930
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the effects on manual dexterity of the thickness of handcovering. Twelve men were timed as they performed five dexterity tests while barehanded and while wearing each of three thicknesses of chemical protective gloves, 0·18 mm, 0·36 mm, and 0·64 mm. The subjects participated in 14 sessions held on consecutive weekdays. Analysis of the data from six sessions spanning the test period yielded significant main effects (p<0·001) of handwear and of session on all dexterity tests. Mean times were best with bare hands and poorest with the 0·64 mm gloves. Performance with the gloves improved over sessions to the extent that the results with gloves approached or surpassed performance levels achieved with the bare hands during the early sessions. Regression analyses carried out on the data from the last three sessions revealed a linear increase in times to test completion as a function of increases in thickness of the handcovering. The occurrence of damage to the gloves, in the form of punctures and tears, was inversely related to thickness. The findings suggest that selection of the thinnest glove material compatible with protection from the chemical environment and practice working with the handwear will result in relatively efficient manual performance.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Glove Characteristics Influencing Control ManipulabilityHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1969
- Performance Assessment Based on an Empirically Derived Task TaxonomyHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1967
- Effects of massed practice and thickness of handcoverings on manipulation with gloves.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1959
- Dimensional analysis of psychomotor abilities.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954