Inhomogeneity of the circulating BFU‐E regulation in sickle cell anaemia: accessory cells properties and BFU‐E growth factor response pattern

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Sickle cell anaemia (SS) patients with low (< 9%) HbF levels (LFSS) are characterized by an increased number of circulating BFU-E in active DNA synthesis, and release of burst promoting activity (BPA) by unstimulated low density (LD) adherent cells. In contrast, circulating BFU-E from SS patients with high (> 9%) HbF levels (HFSS) are normal in number, largely in resting phase, and their LD cells do not release BPA-like activity. We report now that in LFSS patients, adherent cell depletion decreases BFU-E growth in culture and apparent BFU-E cycling. Furthermore, addition of conditioned media (CM) from LD cells of LFSS patients restored cycling BFU-E expression in culture. Neutralization analysis with anti-GM-CSF antibody demonstrated that GM-CSF is, at least, one factor responsible for BPA activity present in this CM. Thus, GM-CSF is constitutively produced by unstimulated monocytes in LFSS patients. In contrast, HFSS patients' adherent cell depletion increases cycling of BFU-E in culture. CM from HFSS patients inhibits BFU-E expression in culture. Hence, LD adherent cells from HFSS patients may release a yet unknown inhibitor factor(s). In addition, we report a distinct response pattern in SS patients' BFU-E to growth factor (GM-CSF, IL-3): (a) LFSS patients have a BFU-E population, equally responsive to GM-CSF and IL-3; (b) HFSS patients, have a subset of BFU-E exclusively dependent on IL-3 (20-40% of the circulating BFU-E). This pattern is very similar to that of normal BFU-E. In conclusion, BFU-E from LFSS patients represent an actively proliferating population, equally responsive to GM-CSF and IL-3, controlled by constitutively produced GM-CSF, suggesting a unique BFU-E behaviour in SS patients with low HbF levels and high haemopoietic stress. The heterogeneous regulation of BFU-E in SS disease seems to be the epiphenomenon of HbF levels, and not vice versa.