A 10‐week randomized trial comparing eccentric vs. concentric hamstring strength training in well‐trained soccer players

Top Cited Papers
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Purpose:  To compare the effects of a 10‐week training program with two different exercises – traditional hamstring curl (HC) and Nordic hamstrings (NH), a partner exercise focusing the eccentric phase – on muscle strength among male soccer players.Methods:  Subjects were 21 well‐trained players who were randomized to NH training (n=11) or HC training (n=10). The programs were similar, with a gradual increase in the number of repetitions from two sets of six reps to three sets of eight to 12 reps over 4 weeks, and then increasing load during the final 6 weeks of training. Strength was measured as maximal torque on a Cybex dynamometer before and after the training period.Results:  In the NH group, there was an 11% increase in eccentric hamstring torque measured at 60° s−1, as well as a 7% increase in isometric hamstring strength at 90°, 60° and 30° of knee flexion. Since there was no effect on concentric quadriceps strength, there was a significant increase in the hamstrings:quadriceps ratio from 0.89±0.12 to 0.98±0.17 (11%) in the NH group. No changes were observed in the HC group.Conclusion:  NH training for 10 weeks more effectively develops maximal eccentric hamstring strength in well‐trained soccer players than a comparable program based on traditional HC.

This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit: