Performance Evaluation of Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 5 (5) , 749-768
- https://doi.org/10.1089/152091503322526969
Abstract
Many new technologies are being applied to measure blood glucose concentrations, but there is a lack of a standardized approach to evaluate performance of these devices. We sought to identify the key elements in evaluating the performance of devices for measuring blood glucose. We examined these elements in a multicenter study of four brands of glucose meters that are commonly used by diabetic patients. We tested control materials, spiked whole blood specimens, and 461 heparinized whole blood specimens in triplicate by each of the four brand glucose meters, and analyzed the plasma glucose concentrations of these specimens by a hexokinase (HK) method that incorporated reference materials developed by National Institute of Standards and Technology. Testing with glucose meters was performed at three sites, with multiple operators, meters, and representative lots of reagents. We evaluated the systematic bias, random error, and clinical significance of glucose meters. Meters were precise with a coefficient of variation of 0.98 and standard error of estimation Sy/x <13 mg/dL for both meters). Analysis of the clinical significance of bias by Clarke Error Grid showed that results of the four meters were outside the accurate zone (26.5%, 2.4%, 1.5%, and 5.6%). Only a small number of the results showed clinically significant bias, mostly in the hypoglycemic range. Meters performed consistently throughout the study and, generally, were precise, although precision varied at extremely high or low glucose concentrations. Two of the glucose meters had substantial systematic bias when compared with an HK method, indicating a need for improving calibration and standardization. Analytical performance varied over the physiological range of glucose values so that separate accuracy and precision goals should be defined for hypoglycemic, normoglycemic, and hyperglycemic ranges. This study describes the current state of performance of blood glucose monitoring devices and points out those factors that should be assessed during evaluation of new devices.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2002
- Optimization of preanalytical conditions and analysis of plasma glucose. 1. Impact of the new WHO and ADA recommendations on diagnosis of diabetes mellitusScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2001
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Evaluation of five devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose in the normoglycaemic rangeExperimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes, 1998
- Comparison of First-Generation and Second-Generation Blood Glucose Meters for Use in a Hospital SettingThe Diabetes Educator, 1992
- Extra-laboratory Blood Glucose Measurement: A Policy StatementDiabetic Medicine, 1988
- The accurate determination of serum glucose by isotope dilution mass spectrometry—two methodsJournal of Mass Spectrometry, 1982
- SELF-MONITORING OF BLOOD-GLUCOSEThe Lancet, 1978
- HOME MONITORING OF BLOOD-GLUCOSEThe Lancet, 1978
- Differences between Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose during Oral Glucose Tolerance TestsScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1976