Agreement Between Clinical and Radiological Diagnosis
- 24 October 1970
- Vol. 4 (5729) , 212-214
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.4.5729.212
Abstract
Agreement between radiological and clinical diagnosis and the incidence of unexpected findings has been used as an indicator of the diagnostic contribution of radiology. The overall incidence of agreement was 33% — 533 out of 1,604 x-ray examinations. The wide variation in agreement in different radiological examinations is clearly related to the pathological nature of disease and the limitations of radiological techniques. If diagnostic radiology is to be effective its application rather than interpretation in the clinical situation must be emphasized in training programmes.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rationalizing requests for x-ray films in neurology.BMJ, 1968
- Pulmonary vascular and ventilatory changes in bronchial carcinoma studied by fluorodensitometryClinical Radiology, 1968
- The radiological demonstration of osseous metastases. Experimental observationsClinical Radiology, 1967
- ACCURACY IN DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRIC AND DUODENAL LESIONS BY GENERAL PRACTITIONERS, HOSPITAL CLINICIANS, AND RADIOLOGISTSThe Lancet, 1965
- Correlation between radiological diagnosis and structural lung changes in emphysemaClinical Radiology, 1964
- THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGIC STUDIESThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1961