Gender schemas and perceptions of speech style
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 51 (3) , 253-267
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390199
Abstract
This study examined Bem's Gender Schema Theory as it relates to communicator style. Participants who had completed the Bem Sex‐Role Inventory (N = 793) were presented with transcribed interpersonal exchanges in which one speaker's communication style was manipulated to appear either powerless or generic. Impressions of the speakers were recorded on a number of interpersonal attribution items. Although results failed to substantiate many of the predicted differences between sex‐typedand non‐sex‐typed persons’ perceptions of speakers’ power, two main effects for powerless speech were found: (1) speakers using powerless language were perceived to be less dominant than generic speakers, and (2) powerless speakers were perceived to be more competent than generic speakers. Implications of these findings for power issues and Gender Schema Theory are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Language style on trial: Effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech upon judgments of victims and villainsWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 1981
- The folk‐linguistics of women's speech: An empirical examinationCommunication Monographs, 1981
- Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing.Psychological Review, 1981
- The BSRI and gender schema theory: A reply to Spence and Helmreich.Psychological Review, 1981
- Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speechJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978
- Sex-Related Patterns in the Unit of PerceptionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1977
- Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- The question of tag questions in women's speech: they don't really use more of them, do they?↓Language in Society, 1975
- Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970