The accuracy of hysterosalpingography versus laparoscopy in evaluation of infertile women
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Vol. 24 (1) , 9-12
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(86)90016-0
Abstract
Two hundred fifteen infertile women underwent hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy. One hundred twenty-eight patients had bilaterally patent tubes on hysterosalpingography. Thirty-one percent of these women had pelvic adhesions diagnosed by laparoscopy. Eighty-seven women had either occluded tubes or suspected pelvic adhesions on hysterosalpingography. Thirty-nine percent of these women had patent tubes without any pelvic pathology on laparoscopy. Inaccurate diagnoses limit the value of hysterosalpingography in evaluation of tubal and peritubal pathology.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- HysterosalpingographyFertility and Sterility, 1983
- Microsurgery and postinfectious tubal infertilityFertility and Sterility, 1982
- EVALUATION OF PATIENTS FOR MICROSURGERYClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980
- Correlation between Hysterosalpingography and Pelvic Endoscopy for the Evaluation of Tubal FactorFertility and Sterility, 1975
- Laparoscopy Vs. Hysterosalpingography in Sterility Investigations. A Comparative StudyFertility and Sterility, 1972
- A Nine-Year Survey of Fallopian Tube Dysfunction in Human InfertilityFertility and Sterility, 1969
- Hysterosalpingography in Relation to Pregnancy and its Outcome in Infertile WomenFertility and Sterility, 1966
- Evaluation of Tubal FunctionFertility and Sterility, 1957
- Facts and Fantasy in the Study of Female Infertility*BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1948