The Law of the Nuremberg Trial
- 1 January 1947
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Journal of International Law
- Vol. 41 (1) , 38-72
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2193853
Abstract
On the afternoon of October 1, 1946, the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg sentenced twelve of the twenty-two Nazi defendants to death by hanging and seven to imprisonment for terms ranging from ten years to life. Three were acquitted. Three of the six accused organizations were found to be criminal. The reading of these sentences was preceded by the reading, through the whole of September 30, of the general opinion of the Tribunal on the four counts of the indictment and, on the morning of October 1, of the opinion on the charges against each defendant.1 The Control Council for Germany considered applications for clemency for most of those convicted but did not grant them and carried out the executions of those sentenced to death on October16 with the exception of Martin Bormann who had not been found and Hermann Goering who had succeeded in committing suicide a few hours earlier. Thus came to an end what President Truman described as “ the first international criminal assize in history.” “ I have no hesitancy in declaring,” continued the President, “ that the historic precedent set at Nuremberg abundantly justifies the expenditure of effort, prodigious though it was. This precedent becomes basic in the international law of the future. The principles established and the results achieved place International Law on the side of peace as against aggressive warfare.” 2Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Consequences of the Nuremberg TrialThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1946
- The Nuremberg TrialThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1946
- Justice at NurembergForeign Affairs, 1946
- Criminal Responsibility of Individuals and International LawThe University of Chicago Law Review, 1945
- Universality of Jurisdiction over War CrimesCalifornia Law Review, 1945
- Collective and Individual Responsibility in International Law with Particular Regard to the Punishment of War CriminalsCalifornia Law Review, 1943
- The Utility of the Proposed Trial and Punishment of Enemy LeadersAmerican Political Science Review, 1943
- The Law and Procedure of War Crime TrialsAmerican Political Science Review, 1943
- The Legal Liability of the KaiserAmerican Political Science Review, 1919
- Grotius’s Doctrine of DutiesPublished by Springer Nature ,1919