Rational choice, culture change, and fisheries management in the gulf of Maine
- 19 May 2004
- book chapter
- Published by Emerald Publishing
Abstract
The difference between the highly successful Maine lobster industry and the crisis-ridden New England ground fishery is that the lobster industry has been able to organize politically to get legislation to solve a number of communal action dilemmas. The groundfishery has not been able to do so. What has made the difference is the lobster industry's development of a conservation ethic over the past 70 years, as additional conservation laws, increasing catches, and ideational factors reinforced each other in an upward spiral. In the groundfishery, top down management policies, biology, and technology all worked against developing effective rules, which led to cheating, a “gold rush mentality” and overexploitation.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distribution Fights, Coordination Games, and Lobster ManagementComparative Studies in Society and History, 2000
- Lobster Trap Limits: A Solution to a Communal Action ProblemHuman Organization, 1998
- Bust and Then Boom in the Maine Lobster Industry: Perspectives of Fishers and BiologistsNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 1997
- The Politics of Managing the Maine Lobster Industry: 1860 to the PresentHuman Ecology, 1997
- Order out of ChaosAmerican Anthropologist, 1996
- Chaos, complexity and community management of fisheriesMarine Policy, 1994
- Government Regulation and Exploitive Capacity: The Case of the New England GroundfisheryHuman Organization, 1984