Extended Deterrence with Nuclear Weapons: How Necessary, How Acceptable?
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Review of Politics
- Vol. 50 (2) , 282-302
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500015680
Abstract
Most policy and normative problems with nuclear weaponry arise in the context of extended deterrence; that is, deterrence of attacks on friends or allies of a nuclear power. This article reviews the history and contradictions of post-World War II Western extended deterrent strategy, considers the sources of differences and similarities in the perspectives of the American and West German Catholic bishops on these matters, presents a logical schema of types of deterrent situations, discusses some systematic historical evidence that suggests the utility of nuclear weapons for many of these situations is often exaggerated, and, after reviewing alternative strategies, suggests a role for a very limited “countercombatant” nuclear strategy.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deterrence Failure and Crisis EscalationInternational Studies Quarterly, 1988
- Reply to WintersThe Review of Politics, 1986
- Bishops and Scholars: The Peace Pastoral Under SiegeThe Review of Politics, 1986
- Terror without DeterrenceJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1984
- Extended Deterrence by Superpower AllianceJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1983
- Deterrence and DefensePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1961