NEW EMBO MEMBER'S REVIEW: T-cell factors: turn-ons and turn-offs
Open Access
- 15 May 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in The EMBO Journal
- Vol. 21 (10) , 2303-2311
- https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.10.2303
Abstract
The family of T‐cell factor (Tcf) and lymphoid enhancer factor (Lef) proteins, which in mammals comprises Tcf1, Lef1, Tcf3 and Tcf4, form a subgroup of the high mobility group (HMG) box‐containing superfamily of transcription factors. Alternative splicing and promoter usage give rise to multiple Tcf isoforms, possessing diverse functional domains (Figure 1) (van de Wetering et al ., 1996; Korinek et al ., 1998; Duval et al ., 2000; Hovanes et al ., 2000, 2001). Tcfs bind DNA as monomers. The 80 amino acid HMG box mediates sequence‐specific binding to a core consensus sequence AGATCAAAGGG through contacts made predominantly within the minor groove of the DNA helix (Giese et al ., 1991; van de Wetering et al ., 1991; van Beest et al ., 2000). Tcfs, like other HMG box‐containing transcription factors, have been described as architectural proteins due to their ability to induce substantial bends in DNA, potentially facilitating the formation of large nucleoprotein complexes and thereby promoting transcription (Giese et al ., 1992). However, Tcf molecules by themselves are incapable of modulating transcription. Instead they bind a number of auxilliary proteins, thereby recruiting essential functional domains to the regulatory regions of target genes. This review will focus mainly on the identity of these Tcf co‐factors. Figure 1. Schematic representation of Tcf splice variants and their most conserved domains. Short forms of Tcf1 and Lef1 lack the N‐terminal domain, which interacts with β‐catenin. The CAD domain in Lef1 is required for context‐dependent activation of the TCRα enhancer. The HMG box mediates sequence‐specific DNA binding. The most divergent region of the Tcf family members is the C‐terminus, which in certain longer isoforms contains a conserved motif, CRARF, whose function is presently unknown, and two CtBP binding sites. Tcfs are highly conserved through evolution (Figure 2). Experiments in a diverse range of species, including Hydra …Keywords
This publication has 99 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chromatin-specific regulation of LEF-1–β-catenin transcription activation and inhibition in vitroGenes & Development, 2001
- Inhibition of Tcf3 Binding by I-mfa Domain ProteinsMolecular and Cellular Biology, 2001
- Sequence-specific HMG box factors recognize 10-12 base pair minor groove motifsJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2000
- Wnt3a-/--like phenotype and limb deficiency in Lef1-/-Tcf1-/- miceGenes & Development, 1999
- The F-box protein β-TrCP associates with phosphorylated β-catenin and regulates its activity in the cellPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- The SCFbeta -TRCP-ubiquitin ligase complex associates specifically with phosphorylated destruction motifs in Ikappa Balpha and beta -catenin and stimulates Ikappa Balpha ubiquitination in vitroGenes & Development, 1999
- Constitutive Transcriptional Activation by a β-Catenin-Tcf Complex in APC −/− Colon CarcinomaScience, 1997
- The Affinity of Nuclear Factor 1 for Its DNA Site Is Drastically Reduced by Nucleosome Organization Irrespective of Its Rotational or Translational PositionJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1996
- Nucleosome displacement in transcriptionCell, 1993
- Role of Nucleosomal Cores and Histone H1 in Regulation of Transcription by RNA Polymerase IIScience, 1991