OVX1, macrophage-colony stimulating factor, and CA-125-II as tumor markers for epithelial ovarian carcinoma
Open Access
- 27 November 2001
- Vol. 92 (11) , 2837-2844
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20011201)92:11<2837::aid-cncr10093>3.0.co;2-5
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian carcinoma remains the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy in Australia, the Netherlands, and the United States. CA‐125‐II, the most widely used serum marker, has limited sensitivity and specificity for detecting small‐volume, early‐stage disease. Therefore, a panel of three serum tumor markers—OVX1, CA‐125‐II, and macrophage‐colony stimulating factor (M‐CSF)—has been used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of multiple markers for the detection of early‐stage ovarian carcinoma. METHODS Preoperative serum levels of OVX1, CA‐125‐II, and M‐CSF were measured in 281 patients with primary ovarian epithelial tumors of different histotypes. Among these tumors, 175 were malignant, 29 were of borderline malignancy, and 77 were benign. The three markers also were measured in sera from 117 apparently healthy women. Marker levels were considered abnormal at CA‐125‐II > 35 U/mL, OVX1 > 7.2 U/mL, and M‐CSF > 3.5 ng/mL. RESULTS Among 175 women with malignant ovarian tumors, at least one of the three serum markers was elevated in 85%, whereas CA‐125‐II was elevated in 80% (P = 0.008). In 58 patients with Stage I ovarian carcinoma, at least one of the three serum markers was elevated in 76%, whereas CA‐125 levels were elevated in 66% (P = 0.04). For patients with borderline and benign tumors, a combination of the three antigens had slightly higher sensitivity compared with CA‐125‐II, but the differences were not statistically significant. Among 117 apparently healthy women, CA‐125‐II was elevated in 4%, and one of the three markers was positive in 17%. CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity of a combination of three serum markers was significantly greater than the sensitivity of the CA‐125‐II assay alone in patients with primary ovarian epithelial tumors of different histotypes. This was true for all stages, including early‐stage, potentially curable disease. When used as single markers, however, only the CA‐125‐II assay could distinguish invasive Stage I tumors from apparently healthy women. Cancer 2001;92:2837–44. © 2001 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surface Epithelial—Stromal Tumors of the OvaryPublished by Springer Nature ,1994
- OVX1 radioimmunoassay complements CA-125 for predicting the presence of residual ovarian carcinoma at second-look surgical surveillance procedures.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1993
- Increased serum levels of macrophage colony-stimulating factor in ovarian cancerAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- Improved prognosis of ovarian cancer in The Netherlands during the period 1975–1985: A registry-based studyGynecologic Oncology, 1991
- Tribute to Patrick Steptoe: beginnings of laparoscopyHuman Reproduction, 1989
- Circulating levels of CSF-1 (M-CSF) a lymphohematopoietic cytokine may be a useful marker of disease status in patients with malignant ovarian neoplasmsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1989
- Constitutive production of macrophage colony-stimulating factor by human ovarian and breast cancer cell lines.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1989
- Ovarian carcinoma: A decade of progressCancer, 1984
- A Radioimmunoassay Using a Monoclonal Antibody to Monitor the Course of Epithelial Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Monoclonal antibodies and human tumor pathologyHuman Pathology, 1982