Dark Energy versus Modified Gravity
Top Cited Papers
- 21 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 98 (12) , 121301
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.98.121301
Abstract
There is now strong observational evidence that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating. The standard explanation invokes an unknown “dark energy” component. But such scenarios are faced with serious theoretical problems, which has led to increased interest in models where instead general relativity is modified in a way that leads to the observed accelerated expansion. The question then arises whether the two scenarios can be distinguished. Here we show that this may not be so easy, demonstrating explicitly that a generalized dark energy model can match the growth rate of the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati model and reproduce the dimensional metric perturbations. Cosmological observations are then unable to distinguish the two cases.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Separating dark physics from physical darkness: Minimalist modified gravity versus dark energyPhysical Review D, 2007
- Crossing the phantom dividePhysical Review D, 2006
- On the Growth of Perturbations as a Test of Dark Energy and GravityThe Astrophysical Journal, 2006
- Dipole of the Luminosity Distance: A Direct Measure of H(z)Physical Review Letters, 2006
- Cosmic growth history and expansion historyPhysical Review D, 2005
- CURVATURE QUINTESSENCE MATCHED WITH OBSERVATIONAL DATAInternational Journal of Modern Physics D, 2003
- Cosmology on a brane in Minkowski bulkPhysics Letters B, 2001
- Metastable gravitons and infinite volume extra dimensionsPhysics Letters B, 2000
- Brane cosmological evolution in a bulk with cosmological constantPhysics Letters B, 2000
- Cosmological Perturbation Theory in the Synchronous and Conformal Newtonian GaugesThe Astrophysical Journal, 1995