New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review System
- 1 July 1991
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Vol. 16 (3) , 322-341
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600303
Abstract
Peer review of grant applications, it has been suggested, might be distorted by what is popularly termed old boyism, cronyism, or particularism. We argue that the existing debate emphasizes the more uninteresting aspects of the peer review system and that the operation of old boyism, as currently understood would have little effect on the overall direction of science. We identify a phenomenon of cognitive particularism, which we consider to be more important than the institutional cronyism analyzed in previous studies. We illustrate with material drawn from observation of grant-awarding commit tees of the (British) Science and Engineering Research CounciL In the concluding discussion, we explore some of the possible implications for the peer review system.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- First Comprehensive Survey of NSF Applicants Focuses on Their Concerns About Proposal ReviewScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1989
- Dimensions of DebateSocial Studies of Science, 1986
- The Possibilities of Science PolicySocial Studies of Science, 1985
- Peer Review of Interdisciplinary Research ProposalsScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1985
- Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To ItScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1985
- Chance and Consensus in Peer ReviewScience, 1981
- Stages in the Empirical Programme of RelativismSocial Studies of Science, 1981
- Peer Review at the NSF: A Dialectical Policy AnalysisSocial Studies of Science, 1979
- NSF and Its Critics in Congress: New Pressure on Peer ReviewScience, 1975
- Peer Review System: How to Hand Out Money FairlyScience, 1973