Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 May 2011
- journal article
- practice guideline
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 34 (6) , e61-e99
- https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-9998
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple laboratory tests are used to diagnose and manage patients with diabetes mellitus. The quality of the scientific evidence supporting the use of these tests varies substantially. APPROACH An expert committee compiled evidence-based recommendations for the use of laboratory testing for patients with diabetes. A new system was developed to grade the overall quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. Draft guidelines were posted on the Internet and presented at the 2007 Arnold O. Beckman Conference. The document was modified in response to oral and written comments, and a revised draft was posted in 2010 and again modified in response to written comments. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and the Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Committee of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry jointly reviewed the guidelines, which were accepted after revisions by the Professional Practice Committee and subsequently approved by the Executive Committee of the American Diabetes Association. CONTENT In addition to long-standing criteria based on measurement of plasma glucose, diabetes can be diagnosed by demonstrating increased blood hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) concentrations. Monitoring of glycemic control is performed by self-monitoring of plasma or blood glucose with meters and by laboratory analysis of HbA1c. The potential roles of noninvasive glucose monitoring, genetic testing, and measurement of autoantibodies, urine albumin, insulin, proinsulin, C-peptide, and other analytes are addressed. SUMMARY The guidelines provide specific recommendations that are based on published data or derived from expert consensus. Several analytes have minimal clinical value at present, and their measurement is not recommended.Keywords
This publication has 349 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis find that over 40 loci affect risk of type 1 diabetesNature Genetics, 2009
- Genotype Score in Addition to Common Risk Factors for Prediction of Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controlsNature, 2007
- Robust associations of four new chromosome regions from genome-wide analyses of type 1 diabetesNature Genetics, 2007
- N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide, C-Reactive Protein, and Urinary Albumin Levels as Predictors of Mortality and Cardiovascular Events in Older AdultsJAMA, 2005
- Risk assessment, prediction and prevention of type 1 diabetesPediatric Diabetes, 2001
- Serum fructosamine concentrations in patients with type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus during changes in management.BMJ, 1984
- Differences between Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose during Oral Glucose Tolerance TestsScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1976