Selection of the Type of Urinary Diversion in Conjunction with Radical Cystectomy
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 137 (6) , 1154-1155
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44432-6
Abstract
Several different methods of urinary diversion currently are available for use in conjunction with radical cystectomy. The method of urinary diversion performed at the time of radical cystectomy was reviewed for patients undergoing surgery from April 1984 through March 1986. A total of 91 urinary diversions was performed. Of the patients 74 per cent had a diversion with an external appliance (including 68 per cent with an ileal conduit), 14 per cent had a continent urinary reservoir (Kock pouch) and 11 per cent had an internal reservoir anastomosed to the urethra and, thus, avoided any stoma. There are inherent disadvantages to each form of urinary diversion and patient selection will be important to identify the most appropriate method of diversion for an individual.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ileal conduit urinary diversion: Early and late results of 132 cases in a 25-year periodWorld Journal of Urology, 1985
- The cecoileal continent urinary reservoirWorld Journal of Urology, 1985
- The mainz-pouch (mixed augmentation ileum 'n zecum) for bladder augmentation and continent diversionWorld Journal of Urology, 1985
- The continent cecal reservoir for urinary diversionWorld Journal of Urology, 1985
- Bladder replacement by ileocystoplasty following radical cystectomyWorld Journal of Urology, 1985
- Ongoing experience with the kock continent ileal reservoir for urinary diversionWorld Journal of Urology, 1985
- Complications of ileal conduit diversion in adults with cancer followed up for at least five years.BMJ, 1985
- Clinical Experience with the Kock Continent Ileal Reservoir for Urinary DiversionJournal of Urology, 1984