Laparoscopic ultrasonography during cholecystectomy

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The routine use of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy has been debated extensively. Intraoperative ultrasonography was a quick, efficient alternative in open cholecystectomy. A prospective controlled trial to evaluate its usefulness in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is reported. Two groups of 100 patients each were examined during operation with laparoscopic ultrasonography and intraoperative cholangiography. In the first group an adapted urethral probe was used and in the second group a new specialized laparoscopic probe. Intraoperative cholangiography followed immediately after laparoscopic ultrasonography in each patient. In group 1 bile duct stones (n = 4) were detected with a sensitivity of 100 and 75 per cent, a specificity of 98 and 99 per cent, and an overall accuracy of 98 per cent for both ultrasonography and cholangiography. In group 2, 11 patients demonstrated common duct calculi. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy for laparoscopic ultrasonography and intraoperative cholangiography were 91 and 64 per cent, 100 and 100 per cent, and 99 and 96 per cent respectively. The differences between groups 1 and 2 and between ultrasonography and cholangiography were not significant. Variations in the anatomy of the bile duct were observed in 21 patients in group 1 by laparoscopic ultrasonography and in 20 by intraoperative cholangiography. In group 2, 64 variations were demonstrated in 50 individuals by ultrasonography and 61 variations in 47 patients by cholangiography. Vascular variations were seen with ultrasonography in 22 and 24 patients in groups 1 and 2 respectively. In conclusion, laparoscopic ultrasonography (with either probe) proved as accurate as intraoperative cholangiography in detecting bile duct stones, and the specialized probe detected significantly more variations of the bile duct than the adapted probe.