Validation of a clinical prognostic model to identify low‐risk patients with pulmonary embolism
- 5 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 261 (6) , 597-604
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01785.x
Abstract
To validate the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI), a clinical prognostic model which identifies low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). Validation study using prospectively collected data. A total of 119 European hospitals. A total of 899 patients diagnosed with PE. The PESI uses 11 clinical factors to stratify patients with PE into five classes (I-V) of increasing risk of mortality. We calculated the PESI risk class for each patient and the proportion of patients classified as low-risk (classes I and II). The outcomes were overall and PE-specific mortality for low-risk patients at 3 months after presentation. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values to predict overall and PE-specific mortality and the discriminatory power using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Overall and PE-specific mortality was 6.5% (58/899) and 2.3% (21/899) respectively. Forty-seven per cent of patients (426/899) were classified as low-risk. Low-risk patients had an overall mortality of only 1.2% (5/426) and a PE-specific mortality of 0.7% (3/426). The sensitivity was 91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 81-97%] and the negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 97-100%) for overall mortality. The sensitivity was 86% (95% CI: 64-97%) and the negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98-100%) for PE-specific mortality. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for overall and PE-specific mortality were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.86) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68-0.86) respectively. This validation study confirms that the PESI reliably identifies low-risk patients with PE who are potential candidates for less costly outpatient treatment.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of a model to predict adverse outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolismEuropean Heart Journal, 2005
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolismBMJ, 2005
- Home therapy for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in cancer patientsAnnals of Oncology, 2005
- Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography in Suspected Pulmonary EmbolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Thrombolysis Compared With Heparin for the Initial Treatment of Pulmonary EmbolismCirculation, 2004
- Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-Dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management studyThe American Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Validation of a risk score identifying patients with acute pulmonary embolism, who are at low risk of clinical adverse outcomeThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2004
- Managing pulmonary embolismBMJ, 2003
- British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolismThorax, 2003
- A Prediction Rule to Identify Low-Risk Patients with Community-Acquired PneumoniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997