Treatment of Ureteric Colic. Intravenous versus Rectal Administration of Indomethacin
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 65 (6) , 576-579
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14823.x
Abstract
A randomised multicentre clinical trial was undertaken to compare the effect on pain indomethacin administered either intravenously or rectally to 116 patients with ureteric colic. Adverse reactions were also assessed. Of the patients receiving the intravenous injection, 48/53 (91%) acheived good pain relief (i.e. no supplementary analgesia was required) 30 min after administraion, compared with 46/63 (73%) receiving the enema. Significantly more side effects occurred in the group treated intravenously. It was concluded that indomethacin administered as an enema was less effective than the intravenous form, but it should be regarded as a good alternative in the treatment of ureteric colic.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- INTRAVENOUS INDOMETHACIN IN THE TREATMENT OF URETERIC COLIC - A CLINICAL MULTICENTER STUDY WITH PETHIDINE AND METAMIZOL AS THE CONTROL PREPARATIONS1983
- PROSTAGLANDIN-SYNTHETASE INHIBITION WITH DICLOFENAC SODIUM IN TREATMENT OF RENAL COLIC: COMPARISON WITH USE OF A NARCOTIC ANALGESICThe Lancet, 1982
- Indomethacin by Intravenous Infusion in Ureteral ColicScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1982
- Treatment of Ureteral Colic with Intravenous IndomethacinJournal of Urology, 1978