Limited (information only) patient education programs for adults with asthma
- 21 January 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2010 (1) , CD001005
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001005
Abstract
Background A key component of many asthma management guidelines is the recommendation for patient education and regular medical review. A number of controlled trials have been conducted to measure the effectiveness of asthma education programmes. These programmes improve patient knowledge, but their impact on health outcomes is less well established. At its simplest level, education is limited to the transfer of information about asthma, its causes and its treatment. This review focused on the effects of limited asthma education. Objectives The objective of this review was to assess the effects of limited (i.e. information only) asthma education on health outcomes in adults with asthma. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles. Selection criteria Randomised and controlled trials of individual asthma education involving information transfer only in adults over 16 years of age. Data collection and analysis Trial quality was assessed and two reviewers extracted data independently. Study authors were contacted for missing information. Main results Twelve trials were included. They were of variable quality. Limited asthma education did not reduce hospitalisation for asthma (weighted mean difference ‐0.03 average hospitalisations per person per year, 95% confidence interval ‐0.09 to 0.03). There was no significant effect on doctor visits, lung function and medication use. The effects on asthma symptoms were variable. There was no reduction in days lost from normal activity, but in two studies, perceived asthma symptoms did improve after limited asthma education (odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.74). In one study, limited asthma education was associated with reduced emergency department visits (reduction of ‐2.76 average visits per person per year, 95% confidence interval ‐4.34 to 1.18). Authors' conclusions Use of limited asthma education as it has been practiced does not appear to improve health outcomes in adults with asthma although perceived symptoms may improve. Provision of information in the emergency department may be effective, but this needs to be confirmed.Keywords
This publication has 88 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of a population-based asthma management program: quality of life, absenteeism, and utilizationAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2000
- Health outcomes among african american and caucasian adults following a randomized trial of an asthma education program∗Ethnicity & Health, 1997
- Patients' Perceptions Compared with Objective Ratings of Asthma SeverityAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1996
- Educating Asthmatic Patients in Primary Care: a Pilot Study of Small Group EducationFamily Practice, 1994
- Patient, Professional, and Public Education on Behavioral Aspects of Asthma: A Review of Strategies for Change and Needed ResearchJournal of Asthma, 1993
- Comparison of effects of a self management booklet and audiocassette for patients with asthma.BMJ, 1988
- Promoting Self-Management in Adults with Asthma: An Overview of the UAB ProgramHealth Education Quarterly, 1987
- An Evaluation of Approaches to Asthma Self-Management Education for Adults: The AIR/Kaiser-Permanente StudyHealth Education Quarterly, 1987
- The Effect of a Structured Education Program on Knowledge and Psychomotor Skills of Patients Using Beclomethasone Dipropionate Aerosol for Steroid Dependent AsthmaHealth Education Quarterly, 1987
- CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF PATIENT EDUCATION ON ASTHMA MORBIDITY IN GENERAL PRACTICEThe Lancet, 1986