Some Thoughts on the Use of Decision Theory to Set Cutoff Scores: Comment on de Gruijter and Hambleton
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 8 (1) , 9-17
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168400800102
Abstract
In response to an article by de Gruijter and Ham bleton (1984), some thoughts on the use of decision theory for setting cutoff scores on mastery tests are presented. This paper argues that decision theory of fers much more than suggested by de Gruijter and Hambleton and that an attempt at evaluating its poten tials for mastery testing should address the full scale of possibilities. As for the problems de Gruijter and Hambleton have raised, some of them disappear if proper choices from decision theory are made, while others are inherent in mastery testing and will be en countered by any method of setting cutoff scores. Fur ther, this paper points at the development of new tech nology to assist the mastery tester in the application of decision theory. From this an optimistic attitude to wards the potentials of decision theory for mastery testing is concluded.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- On de Encountered Using Decision Theory to Set Cutoff ScoresApplied Psychological Measurement, 1984
- The Linear Utility Model for Optimal SelectionPsychometrika, 1981
- A Nonrandomized Minimax Solution for Passing Scores in the Binomial Error ModelPsychometrika, 1980
- STANDARDS AND CRITERIAJournal of Educational Measurement, 1978
- ON THE USE OF CUT‐OFF SCORES WITH CRITERION‐REFERENCED TESTS IN INSTRUCTIONAL SETTINGSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1978
- Dichotomous decisions based on dichotomously scored items: a case studyStatistica Neerlandica, 1977
- Determination of Optional Cutting Scores in Criterion - Referenced Measurement,The Journal of Experimental Education, 1976
- AN EVALUATION OF SOME MODELS FOR CULTURE‐FAIR SELECTIONJournal of Educational Measurement, 1976
- Defining a "fair" or "unbiased" selection model: A question of utilities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF THEORY AND METHOD FOR CRITERION‐REFERENCED TESTS1,2Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973