Cohesion
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Small Group Research
- Vol. 31 (1) , 89-106
- https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100105
Abstract
The constitutive and operational definitions of group cohesion have varied across various disciplines in group dynamics. Recently, it has been suggested that a conceptualization of cohesion proposed by Carron, Widmeyer, and Brawley could have broad research applicability for different types of groups. However, results from a few studies have raised questions about the validity of this suggestion. One reason that these studies did not support the suggestion is that they failed to take into account the varied nature of groups and group cohesiveness. To clarify issues associated with measuring cohesion and testing various research questions, this article provides a general definition of cohesiveness, a discussion of the theoretical implications of that definition, and some suggestions for the conditions and procedures necessary to examine the structure of group cohesion in a variety of group contexts.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factorial Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire Among MusiciansThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1996
- The Structure of Group CohesionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995
- The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Psychological Bulletin, 1995
- On CohesivenessSmall Group Research, 1992
- Assessing the Cohesion of Teams: Validity of the Group Environment QuestionnaireJournal of Sport Psychology, 1987
- The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment QuestionnaireJournal of Sport Psychology, 1985
- Separating individual and group effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985
- Group cohesiveness reexaminedGroup, 1981
- On Group CohesivenessAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1952
- Concepts and methods in the measurement of group syntality.Psychological Review, 1948