Nomogram use for the prediction of indolent prostate cancer
Open Access
- 24 September 2007
- Vol. 110 (10) , 2218-2221
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23029
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening for prostate cancer has resulted in an increased incidence‐to‐mortality ratio. Not all cancers deserve immediate treatment. It has therefore become more important to be able to identify those cases of screen‐detected prostate cancer most likely to show indolent behavior. METHODS The Kattan‐nomogram for the prediction of indolent prostate cancer was validated and recalibrated for use in a screening setting. The recalibrated nomogram was used to calculate the number of men who were predicted to have indolent cancer in a screen‐detected cohort from the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), section Rotterdam. RESULTS Of 1629 cancers detected in 2 subsequent screening rounds 825 were suitable for nomogram use. The remainder were very unlikely to have indolent cancer. A total of 485 men (485 of 825 = 59%) were predicted to have indolent cancer, which is 30% (485 of 1629) of all screen‐detected cases. Cancers found at repeated screening after 4 years had a higher probability of indolent cancer than cases from the prevalence screening (44% vs 23%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The current nomogram can identify substantial groups of screen‐detected cancers that are likely indolent and can therefore be considered for active surveillance. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delayed Versus Immediate Surgical Intervention and Prostate Cancer OutcomeJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006
- Cancer Statistics, 2006CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2006
- Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention for favorable risk prostate cancerUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 2006
- Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Preoperative PSA Velocity and the Risk of Death from Prostate Cancer after Radical ProstatectomyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Counseling Men With Prostate Cancer: A Nomogram for Predicting the Presence of Small, Moderately Differentiated, Confined TumorsJournal of Urology, 2003
- Temporarily Deferred Therapy (watchful waiting) for Men Younger Than 70 Years and With Low-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prostate-Specific Antigen EraJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SYSTEMATIC BIOPSIES AND HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES OF 222 RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS: LACK OF PREDICTION OF TUMOR SIGNIFICANCE FOR MEN WITH NONPALPABLE PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2001
- Prospective Evaluation of Men With Stage T1C Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1997