Working without Accumulation Membrane in Flow Field-Flow Fractionationa
- 16 November 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Analytical Chemistry
- Vol. 72 (24) , 5945-5954
- https://doi.org/10.1021/ac000608q
Abstract
Nonideal interaction of sample with the separation device is a difficulty found in chromatographic methods as well as in field-flow fractionation. However, in field-flow fractionation (FFF), greater flexibility in the choice of carrier solution composition is possible, thus reducing the need of a wide choice of surface chemistry when nonideal sample interaction is to be minimized. The use of an ultrafiltration membrane as the surface for the accumulation wall is common practice in flow field-flow fractionation. Typical membranes in use are laminates of a skin membrane onto a backing material such as woven polyester. At this point, only a limited choice of membrane chemistries is available. Many membranes have been developed for protein applications as membranes are widely used in the pharmaceutical industries. While these membranes work well for protein applications, flow field-flow fractionation is applicable to polymeric particulate as well as protein samples. Thus, sample interaction with the membrane surface is possible with nonprotein applications and these interactions can induce significant secondary effects on retention ratio and affect instrumental reliability. Also, the woven texture of membranes may detrimentally affect the FFF separation. For these reasons, the study of flow field-flow fractionation using a flat, smooth surface of controlled chemistry is of relevance. We present here the results of a new, membraneless channel that uses a bare frit as the accumulation wall and that is intended for analysis of micrometer-sized particles only. Selectivity results are comparable to those obtained with the membrane, while relative sample recovery indicates that the best quantitative performance can be obtained without the membrane. Moreover, neither sample immobilization nor losses through the frit occur when operating membraneless. On the other hand, first experimental evidence of a certain level of frit surface activity suggests that optimization of experimental conditions is required.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative approach to field-flow fractionation for the characterization of supermicron particlesJournal of Microcolumn Separations, 1997
- Field-Flow Fractionation: Analysis of Macromolecular, Colloidal, and Particulate MaterialsScience, 1993
- Fast Separation and Characterization of Micron Size Particles by Sedimentation/Steric Field-flow Fractionation: Role of Lift ForcesPublished by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) ,1992
- Dual-field and flow-programmed lift hyperlayer field-flow fractionationAnalytical Chemistry, 1992
- Potential-barrier field-flow fractionation, a versatile new separation methodJournal of Chromatography A, 1990
- High-speed size characterization of chromatographic silica by flow/hyperlayer field-flow fractionationJournal of Chromatography A, 1989
- Deconvolution of nonequilibrium band broadening effects for accurate particle size distributions by sedimentation field-flow fractionationAnalytical Chemistry, 1989
- Fast particle separation by flow/steric field-flow fractionationAnalytical Chemistry, 1987
- Improved flow field-flow fractionation system applied to water-soluble polymers: programming, outlet stream splitting, and flow optimizationAnalytical Chemistry, 1986
- Properties of the transition from normal to steric field-flow fractionationAnalytical Chemistry, 1982