A Middle Ground on Public Accountability
- 3 June 2004
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 350 (23) , 2409-2412
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsb041193
Abstract
This Sounding Board article describes the debate over public “report cards” on doctors and hospitals. Providers argue that ratings according to quality are often based on inaccurate and misleading data. Payers argue that any information, even if imperfect, about the performance of physicians and hospitals is helpful to patients. The authors believe that providers and payers should work together to develop better systems for measuring and reporting the quality of care.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physician Clinical Performance AssessmentJAMA, 2003
- Is More Information Better? The Effects of “Report Cards” on Health Care ProvidersJournal of Political Economy, 2003
- Large Employers' New Strategies in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Evaluation of a Consumer-Oriented Internet Health Care Report CardJAMA, 2002
- The Public Release of Performance DataJAMA, 2000
- Use of Public Performance ReportsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- Coding of Acute Myocardial InfarctionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1988