Abstract
Taken‐for‐granteds (TFGs), or uncoded propositions, seem to be as vulnerable to Janguage‐action analysis as is speech. The present essay provides some beginnings to such analysis. Taken‐for‐granteds are described in a brief literature review as being constituted of reflexive relations of patterns and parts‐the parts are micro‐details of messages; the patterns are frames. Following Goffman, a line of research called “frame analysis” is proposed to describe TFG use. Several areas of inquiry are sketched briefly, including: alignment talk, analysis of frame genres, male‐female conversation, and patterns of myth.

This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit: