The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments
Open Access
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Nurse Education Today
- Vol. 26 (8) , 662-671
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.006
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of Violating Standard Item Writing Principles on Tests and Students: The Consequences of Using Flawed Test Items on Achievement Examinations in Medical EducationAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2005
- Quality Multiple-Choice Test Questions: Item-Writing Guidelines and an Analysis of Auditing TestbanksJournal of Education for Business, 1997
- Test DesignNurse Educator, 1996
- Use of an Inclusive Option and the Optimal Number of Options for Multiple-Choice ItemsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1993
- ITEM ANALYSISNurse Educator, 1990
- THE MULTIPLE-CHOICE TEST: DEVELOPING THE TEST BLUEPRINTNurse Educator, 1989
- Bias in Examination Test Banks That Accompany Cost Accounting TextsJournal of Education for Business, 1989
- Validity of a Taxonomy of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing RulesApplied Measurement in Education, 1989
- A Taxonomy of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing RulesApplied Measurement in Education, 1989
- CONSTRUCTING CLASSROOM ACHIEVEMENT TESTSNurse Educator, 1978