Effect of standardized orders and provider education on head-of-bed positioning in mechanically ventilated patients
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 31 (9) , 2285-2290
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000079609.81180.15
Abstract
Semirecumbent head-of-bed positioning in mechanically ventilated patients decreases the risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of a standardized order followed by the initiation of a provider education program would increase the frequency with which our patients were maintained in the semirecumbent position. Prospective, pre-, and postintervention observational study. A tertiary care, U.S. Army teaching hospital. Mechanically ventilated medical and surgical intensive care unit patients. The first intervention involved the addition of an order for semirecumbent head-of-bed positioning to our intensive care unit order sets. This was followed 2 months later with a second intervention, which was a nurse and physician education program emphasizing semirecumbent positioning. Data regarding head-of-bed positioning were collected on 100 patient observations at baseline and at 1 and 2 months after each of our interventions. The mean angle of head of bed increased from 24 +/- 9 degrees at baseline to 35 +/- 9 degrees (p <.05) 2 months after the addition of the standard order. The percentage of observations with head of bed >45 degrees increased from 3% to 16% 2 months after the standardized order (p <.05). Two months after our provider education program, the mean angle of the head of bed was 34 +/- 11 degrees and the percentage of patients with head of bed >45 degrees was 29% (p = NS compared with values after the first intervention). Data collected 6 months after completion of our education programs showed that these improvements were maintained. Standardizing the process of care via the addition of an order specifying head-of-bed position significantly increased the number of patients who were placed in the semirecumbent position. In an era of cost-conscious medicine, interventions that utilize protocols and education programs should be emphasized.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of an education program aimed at reducing the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Ventilator-associated pneumonia: recent issues on pathogenesis, prevention and diagnosisJournal of Hospital Infection, 2001
- Prevention of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia by Oral DecontaminationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- Daily Interruption of Sedative Infusions in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Mechanical VentilationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Semirecumbency among mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a multicenter observational studyClinical Intensive Care, 1999
- The Prevention of Ventilator-Associated PneumoniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Oropharyngeal or Gastric Colonization and Nosocomial Pneumonia in Adult Intensive Care Unit PatientsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1997
- Semirecumbent position protects from pulmonary aspiration but not completely from gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1995
- Gastric and Pharyngeal Flora in Nosocomial Pneumonia Acquired during Mechanical VentilationAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1993
- Pulmonary Aspiration of Gastric Contents in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: The Effect of Body PositionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992