Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare?
- 1 December 2008
- Vol. 94 (12) , 1519-1521
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.135731
Abstract
Since selection of the optimal diagnostic test for a particular patient requires an assessment of the benefits and risks to the patient of each test under consideration, as well as the benefits and risks of not performing any testing, an understanding of the risks from ionising radiation can play an important role in patient management. In this editorial, I examine how radiation risk is quantified and how such estimates differ between different cardiac diagnostic tests.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in 16-slice computed tomography coronary angiographyJournal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2008
- Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gatingEuropean Heart Journal, 2007
- 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysisEuropean Heart Journal, 2007
- Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic ImagingCirculation, 2007
- Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures?The British Journal of Radiology, 2007
- Managing patient dose in interventional cardiologyCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2007
- Role of non-invasive imaging in the management of coronary artery disease: an assessment of likely change over the next 10 years. A report from the British Cardiovascular Society Working GroupHeart, 2007
- MDCT of the Coronary Arteries: Feasibility of Low-Dose CT with ECG-Pulsed Tube Current Modulation to Reduce Radiation DoseAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2006
- Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily PracticeCirculation, 2006
- EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiologyEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2005