Endopyelotomy and Pyeloplasty: Face to Face
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in European Urology
- Vol. 26 (4) , 281-285
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000475400
Abstract
46 symptomatic adult patients with documented ureteropelvic junction obstruction were treated with pyeloplasty (n = 23) or endopyelotomy (n = 23). Basic characteristics in both the groups were comparable. The technical aspects, complications and outcome, in the form of improvement in function and drainage patterns, were compared in both the groups. Endopyelotomy enjoyed the significant advantages of a shorter operating time and hospital stay, and obviously better cosmetic acceptance. The major complications in the endopyelotomy groups were related to external drainage and secondary infection in the form of fever, secondary hemorrhage and slippage of tubes in 44,9 and 13% of cases, respectively. Complications associated with pyeloplasty were prolonged urinary leak, wound infection and urinary tract infection in 12, 17 and 22% of cases, respectively. UsingKeywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: