Five-Year Impact of Quality Improvement for Depression
Open Access
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of General Psychiatry
- Vol. 61 (4) , 378-386
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.4.378
Abstract
Depressive disorders are a leading cause of disability worldwide.1-3 Yet, many depressedpatients, especially historically underserved minority groups, such as Latinosand African Americans, do not receive guideline-concordant care. Depressedprimary care patients who are Latino or African American tend to have poorerhealth outcomes, without practice interventions to improve quality, than dowhites.2,4-7 Qualityimprovement (QI) interventions for depression within primary care can improvequality of care and health outcomes over 6 to 28 months and yield cost-effectivenessratios relative to usual care (UC) that are comparable to commonly used medicaltherapies; however, not all interventions, particularly those focused onlyon providers, improve outcomes.8-15 Furthermore,interventions of longer duration may provide larger long-term benefits.16Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patientsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Treatment preferences among depressed primary care patientsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2000
- Evidence-Based Care For Depression In Managed Primary Care PracticesHealth Affairs, 1999
- Race, Gender, and Partnership in the Patient-Physician RelationshipJAMA, 1999
- Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized TrialsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1999
- Collaborative Management of Chronic IllnessAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Determinants of Emergency Department Use: Are Race and Ethnicity Important?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1996