EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Vol. 31 (4) , 605-620
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605
Abstract
We evaluated the utility of a brief (5‐min) stimulus preference assessment for individuals with developmental disabilities. Participants had noncontingent (free) access to an array of stimuli and could interact with any of the stimuli at any time. Stimuli were never withdrawn or withheld from the participants during a 5‐min session. In Experiment 1, the brief preference assessment was conducted for 10 participants to identify differentially preferred stimuli, and reinforcer assessments were conducted to test the reinforcing efficacy of those stimuli identified as highly preferred. In Experiment 2, a comparison was conducted between the brief preference assessment and a commonly used paired‐stimulus preference assessment. Collectively, results demonstrated that the brief preference assessment identified stimuli that functioned as reinforcers for a simple operant response, identified preferred stimuli that were differentially effective as reinforcers compared to nonpreferred stimuli, was associated with fewer problem behaviors, and required less time to complete than a commonly used paired‐stimulus preference assessment.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- NONCONTINGENT DELIVERY OF ARBITRARY REINFORCERS AS TREATMENT FOR SELF‐INJURIOUS BEHAVIORJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1997
- NONCONTINGENT PRESENTATION OF ATTENTION AND ALTERNATIVE STIMULI IN THE TREATMENT OF ATTENTION‐MAINTAINED DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIORJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1997
- EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCESJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1996
- A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIESJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1992
- IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH PROFOUND HANDICAPS: STAFF OPINION VERSUS SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCESJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1988
- The competition of autistic stereotyped behavior with usual and specially assessed reinforcersResearch in Developmental Disabilities, 1987
- COMPUTERIZED ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCE FOR SEVERELY HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUALSJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1986
- REINFORCER VARIATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MOTIVATING DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDRENJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1981
- TRAINING MENTALLY RETARDED ADOLESCENTS TO BRUSH THEIR TEETH1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975
- Programmed Instruction for Institutionalized Offenders: Contingency Management and Performance ContractsPsychological Reports, 1968