Option Pricing and the Martingale Restriction
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 8 (4) , 1091-1124
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/8.4.1091
Abstract
In the absence of frictions, the value of the underlying asset implied by option prices must equal its actual market value. With frictions, however, this requirement need not hold. Using S&P 100 index options data, I find that the implied cost of the index is significantly higher in the options market than in the stock market, and is directly related to measures of transaction costs and liquidity. I show that the Black-Scholes model has strong bid-ask spread, trading volume, and open interest biases. Option pricing models that relax the martingale restriction perform significantly better.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Informational Content of Implied VolatilityThe Review of Financial Studies, 1993
- Option Replication in Discrete Time with Transaction CostsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- The Crash of '87: Was It Expected? The Evidence from Options MarketsThe Journal of Finance, 1991
- Asset pricing and the bid-ask spreadJournal of Financial Economics, 1986
- Comments on the valuation of derivative assetsJournal of Financial Economics, 1982
- An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunitiesJournal of Financial Economics, 1979
- Prices of State-Contingent Claims Implicit in Option PricesThe Journal of Business, 1978
- Prices for State-Contingent Claims: Some Estimates and ApplicationsThe Journal of Business, 1978
- Fact and Fantasy in the Use of OptionsCFA Magazine, 1975
- The Pricing of Options and Corporate LiabilitiesJournal of Political Economy, 1973