Justifications for the sharing of social science data.
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 12 (2) , 163-171
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01073124
Abstract
Starting with the premise that voluntary sharing of social science data is a desirable professional behavior, this article discusses a variety of justifications for data sharing. These justifications are found to be grounded in the scientific process itself—in the need for science that is more accurate, more open, more knowledgeable, and has more resources at its disposal. Although it is evident that the costs and benefits of data sharing are now unevenly distributed, and that primary researchers currently bear most of the burden and risks, it is argued that the adoption of a data-sharing norm in the social sciences would go a long way to remedy the imbalance. In this regard, the author supports the 1985 data-sharing recommendations put forth by the Committee on National Statistics.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of access and privacy legislation on the conduct of scholarly research in CanadaSocial Science Information Studies, 1984
- Private archives and public needs.American Psychologist, 1983
- Intellectual Property: The Control of Scientific InformationScience, 1982
- Ethical principles of psychologists.American Psychologist, 1981
- Data Protection and Research: A Case Study of ControlThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 1981
- Secondary analysis: In published research in the behavioral sciencesNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1978
- On ensuring the availability of evaluative data for secondary analysisPolicy Sciences, 1978
- Responsibility for Raw Data.American Psychologist, 1962