Criticizing Evidence-Based Medicine
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Thyroid®
- Vol. 10 (2) , 157-160
- https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2000.10.157
Abstract
Despite increasing influence within clinical medicine, what has been defined as "evidence-based medicine" is not a secure basis for treating individual patients. Many writers have pointed this out but their arguments are denied rather than refuted by the enthusiasts. Except in the simplest cases, decisions about treating individuals will always be difficult. Once all the necessary factors for decision are included, "evidence-based medicine" becomes no different from what most physicians recognize simply as sound, sensible medical practice.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- NICE: a panacea for the NHS?BMJ, 1999
- NICE: a step forward in the quality of NHS careThe Lancet, 1999
- In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical ExcellenceThe Lancet, 1999
- Clinical governanceBMJ, 1998
- The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicineAcademic Medicine, 1998
- Looking forward: Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in EnglandBMJ, 1998
- Anaesthesia and evidence‐based medicineAnaesthesia, 1998
- The rise and rise of evidence-based medicineThe Lancet, 1997
- The scope and nature of epidemiologyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Clinical Judgment Revisited: The Distraction of Quantitative ModelsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994