Postoperative Analgesia with Intramuscular Morphine at Fixed Rate Versus Epidural Morphine or Sufentanil and Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- regional anesthesia-and-pain-management
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 87 (6) , 1346-1353
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199812000-00025
Abstract
We assessed the efficacy and side effects of postoperative analgesia with three different pain regimens in 90 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.The patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: epidural morphine (EM) or sufentanil (ES), both combined with bupivacaine, or IM morphine (IM) at fixed intervals. Before incision, patients in the epidural groups received sufentanil or morphine in bupivacaine via a thoracic catheter, followed by a continuous infusion 1 h later. General anesthesia consisted of N2 O/O2 and isoflurane for all groups. Patients in all groups received IV sufentanil as part of their anesthetic management. Patients in the IM group received IV sufentanil 1 [micro sign]g/kg before incision, and patients in all groups received sufentanil 10 [micro sign]g for inadequate analgesia. Postoperatively, the epidural or IM treatment was continued for >or=to5 days. Postoperative analgesia at rest and during coughing and movement was significantly better in the epidural groups than in the IM group during the 5 consecutive days. There were no significant differences between the epidural groups. The incidence of most side effects was similar in all groups. We conclude that epidural analgesia provided better pain relief than IM analgesia, even if the latter was optimized by fixed-dose administration at fixed intervals and included adjustments on demand. Epidural sufentanil and morphine, both combined with bupivacaine, seemed to be equally effective with similar side effects. Implications: Postoperative analgesia with epidural sufentanil or morphine and bupivacaine after major abdominal surgery seemed to be better than the conventional method of IM morphine treatment, despite optimal administration, i.e., fixed doses at fixed intervals with regular adjustments. Analgesic efficacy and side effects of epidural sufentanil and morphine were similar. (Anesth Analg 1998;87:1346-53)Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- High Thoracic Epidural Sufentanil with BupivacaineAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1994
- Synergistic Antinociceptive Interaction after Epidural Coadministration of Morphine and Lidocaine in RatsAnesthesiology, 1994
- Pain management and spirometry following thoracotomy: A prospective, randomized study of four techniquesJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 1993
- Sufentanil: Clinical use as postoperative analgesic—Epidural/intrathecal routeJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1992
- Antinociceptive Synergy Between Intrathecal Morphine and Lidocaine during Visceral and Somatic Nociception in the RatAnesthesiology, 1992
- Epidural bupivacaine, sufentanil or the combination for post-thoracotomy painActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1992
- Effects of Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia on Coagulation and Outcome After Major Vascular SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1991
- Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Relief Following ThoracotomyAnesthesiology, 1987
- Intramuscular or Intralipomatous Injections?New England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- EPIDURAL MORPHINE IN TREATMENT OF PAINThe Lancet, 1979