Long-term outcome of treatment of anemia in MDS with erythropoietin and G-CSF
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 106 (3) , 803-811
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-10-3872
Abstract
We report long-term results of treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). A total of 129 patients were followed up 45 months after last inclusion in the Nordic MDS Group studies. Erythroid response rate was 39% and median response duration 23 months (range, 3-116 months or more). Complete responders showed longer response duration than partial responders (29 versus 12 months, P = .006). The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) groups Low/Intermediate-1 (Low/Int-1) had longer response duration than Int-2/High (25 versus 7 months, P = .002). The time until 25% developed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was longer in the good and intermediate predictive groups for erythroid response compared with the poor predictive group (52 versus 13 months, P = .008). Only 1 of 20 long-term responders developed AML. We assessed the effect on long-term outcome by comparing treated patients with untreated patients selected from the IPSS database using multivariate Cox regression, adjusting for major prognostic variables. There was no difference in survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-1.2; P = .55) or risk of AML evolution (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.2; P = .40) between treated and untreated patients. Patients with high/intermediate probability of response and with IPSS Low/Int-1 show frequent and durable responses without adverse effects on outcome, while other patients should not be considered candidates for this treatment.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health, economic, and quality-of-life effects of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomized, controlled trialBlood, 2004
- The WHO classification of MDS does make a differenceBlood, 2004
- A validated decision model for treating the anaemia of myelodysplastic syndromes with erythropoietin + granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor: significant effects on quality of lifeBritish Journal of Haematology, 2003
- Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor inhibits spontaneous cytochrome c release and mitochondria-dependent apoptosis of myelodysplastic syndrome hematopoietic progenitorsBlood, 2003
- Treatment of anaemia in myelodysplastic syndromes with prolonged administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor and erythropoietinBritish Journal of Haematology, 2000
- Erythroid response to treatment with G‐CSF plus erythropoietin for the anaemia of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: proposal for a predictive modelBritish Journal of Haematology, 1997
- Morphological changes and apoptosis in bone marrow from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with granulocyte-CSF and erythropoietinLeukemia Research, 1997
- Survival or death of individual proerythroblasts results from differing erythropoietin sensitivities: a mechanism for controlled rates of erythrocyte productionBlood, 1993
- A Combination of Granulocvte Colonv-Stimulating Factor and Erythiopoietin may Synergistically Improve the Anaemia in Patients with Myelodysplastic SyndromesLeukemia & Lymphoma, 1993
- Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromesBritish Journal of Haematology, 1982