Erythropoietin Addition to Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Abrogates Life-Threatening Neutropenia and Increases Peripheral-Blood Progenitor-Cell Mobilization After Epirubicin, Paclitaxel, and Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy: Results of a Randomized Comparison
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 17 (4) , 1288
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.4.1288
Abstract
PURPOSE AND METHODS: The ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus erythropoietin (EPO) treatment was compared in a randomized fashion with that of G-CSF treatment alone in promoting hematologic recovery and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) mobilization in previously untreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent their first course of epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy during a phase II study of intensive outpatient ETP chemotherapy followed by high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM) late intensification with PBPC support. RESULTS: Comparative analysis of hematologic recovery of 50 randomized patients, after ETP chemotherapy, showed that life-threatening neutropenia occurred in 88% of the patients treated with G-CSF alone, whereas it occurred in only 4% of patients treated with G-CSF + EPO. Significantly different WBC and polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) counts were observed in the two distinct arms on the day of WBC nadir (P < .0001 and P < .0001, respectively). Moreover, the addition of EPO to G-CSF increased PBPC mobilization and collection as compared with that in G-CSF–treated patients (P = .0009 and P = .0026, respectively), who required a significantly higher number of leukaphereses than G-CSF + EPO–treated patients (P = .0076) to obtain the planned minimum dose of PBPCs. Qualitative analysis by cloning assay of PBPCs collected in both arms revealed that G-CSF– and G-CSF + EPO–mobilized PBPCs have comparable in vitro functional properties. CONCLUSION: This randomized comparison revealed that EPO significantly increases most of the hematologic effect produced by G-CSF administration after chemotherapy. This biologic property of EPO translated in vivo into a global improvement of patients' hematologic status.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cyclophosphamide and Cisplatin Compared with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients with Stage III and Stage IV Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The combination of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor increases the rate of haemopoietic recovery with clinical benefit after peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantationBritish Journal of Haematology, 1996
- Haemopoietic reconstitution after autologous blood stem cell transplantation in patients with malignancies: a multicentre retrospective studyBritish Journal of Haematology, 1994
- Evaluation of a Novel Automated Protocol for the Collection of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Mobilized with Chemotherapy or Chemotherapy Plus G-CSF Using the Fresenius AS104 Cell SeparatorJournal of Hematotherapy, 1993
- TRILINEAGE RECOVERY BY COMBINATION THERAPY WITH RECOMBINANT HUMAN GRANULOCYTE COLONY‐STIMULATING FACTOR (rhG‐CSE) AND RRYTHROPOIETIN (rhEpo) IN SEVERE APLASTIC ANAEMIABritish Journal of Haematology, 1992
- Effect of peripheral-blood progenitor cells mobilised by filgrastim (G-CSF) on platelet recovery after high-dose chemotherapyThe Lancet, 1992
- Erythropoietin Treatment of Anemia Associated with Multiple MyelomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Decreased Erythropoietin Response in Patients with the Anemia of CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Erythropoietin Retards DNA Breakdown and Prevents Programmed Death in Erythroid Progenitor CellsScience, 1990
- Correction of the Anemia of End-Stage Renal Disease with Recombinant Human ErythropoietinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987