Neuroanthropology: a humanistic science for the study of the culture–brain nexus
Open Access
- 4 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
- Vol. 5 (2-3) , 138-147
- https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp024
Abstract
In this article, we argue that a combined anthropology/neuroscience field of enquiry can make a significant and distinctive contribution to the study of the relationship between culture and the brain. This field, which can appropriately be termed as neuroanthropology, is conceived of as being complementary to and mutually informative with social and cultural neuroscience. We start by providing an introduction to the culture concept in anthropology. We then present a detailed characterization of neuroanthropology and its methods and how they relate to the anthropological understanding of culture. The field is described as a humanistic science, that is, a field of enquiry founded on the perceived epistemological and methodological interdependence of science and the humanities. We also provide examples that illustrate the proposed methodological model for neuroanthropology. We conclude with a discussion about specific contributions the field can make to the study of the culture–brain nexus.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- A structural–functional basis for dyslexia in the cortex of Chinese readersProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Cultural and linguistic effects on neural bases of ‘Theory of Mind’ in American and Japanese childrenBrain Research, 2007
- Functional and morphometric brain dissociation between dyslexia and reading abilityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representationPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by culturesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Neural systems for recognition of familiar facesPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000.What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the BrainAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2002
- Imaging Brain Plasticity: Conceptual and Methodological Issues— A Theoretical ReviewNeuroImage, 2000
- Using Consensus Analysis to Measure Cultural Diversity in Organizations and Social MovementsField Methods, 1999
- Between hermeneutics and semioticsInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 1990