The distribution of latencies constrains theories of decision time: A test of the random-walk model using numeric comparison
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 50 (3) , 149-156
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539808258791
Abstract
The random‐walk model for decision accurately predicts both mean reaction time and response accuracy as a function of signal strength and response criterion. Although few have examined the changes, the theory also predicts changes in the shape of the distribution of latencies. In a digit‐comparison task, we used numeric distance to manipulate signal strength, and we used speed versus accuracy instructions to manipulate response criterion. Random‐walk theory correctly predicted changes in the shape of the distribution of response times.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- RTSYS: A DOS application for the analysis of reaction time dataBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1996
- Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- Modeling imageless thought: The relative judgment theory of numerical comparisonsJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1990
- Screen control and timing routines for the IBM microcomputer family using a high-level languageBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1988
- An adaptive filter model for recognition memoryBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1988
- A decision model for accuracy and response latency in recognition memory.Psychological Review, 1987
- Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1984
- The relative judgment theory of two choice response timeJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1975
- Comparisons of digits and dot patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974
- Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965