On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Quality of Life Research
- Vol. 12 (4) , 349-362
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023499322593
Abstract
A lack of clarity exists about the definition and adequate approach for evaluating responsiveness. An overview is presented of different categories of definitions and methods used for calculating...Keywords
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Health Outcomes Methodology SymposiumMedical Care, 2000
- Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendationsPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- MEASURING QUALITY OF LIFEAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1999
- Assessing the Responsiveness of a Quality-of-Life Instrument and the Measurement of Symptom Severity in Essential HypertensionPharmacoEconomics, 1992
- Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluationControlled Clinical Trials, 1991
- Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic EvaluationMedical Care, 1990
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performanceJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- A methodological framework for assessing health indicesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985