Energetics of reproduction in female and male greater snow geese
Open Access
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 103 (3) , 379-389
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00328628
Abstract
Arctic-nesting geese are classified as “capital” breeders (i.e., birds that rely largely on endogenous reserves to meet the high nutrient requirement of clutch formation) as opposed to “income” breeders (those that rely directly on ingested food). However, some evidence has suggested that energy reserves of greater snow geese (Chen caerulescens atlantica) are not sufficient to meet these costs. We tested whether greater snow geese were capital breeders and examined the consequences on their reproductive strategy. We collected 48 females and 47 males from arrival at the breeding colony on Bylot Island (NWT) to the postlaying stage, and determined fat and protein content in somatic and reproductive tissues. Rapid follicular growth was initiated only after arrival on the breeding ground. Somatic fat of females tended to increase during the prelaying and laying stages at the same time that most of the fat was deposited in developing follicles. Decrease in somatic fat in postlaying females was mostly related to its use for meeting metabolic requirements during early incubation. Hence, almost all fat invested in the clutch came from food intake, not endogenous reserves. Somatic protein was maintained during prelaying but decreased during laying, suggesting that some protein reserves were deposited in the eggs. There was no relationship between somatic fat and the number of developing follicles (incubating females excluded) but a relationship was found with somatic protein. Clutch size was not related to body size. In males, somatic fat, which was similar to females at arrival, was almost completely depleted by the postlaying stage. Male somatic protein remained stable. Male somatic reserves were not related to the somatic reserves, clutch size or nutrient investment in reproduction of their mate. We conclude that, in female greater snow geese, little fat reserves (if any) were used for egg formation though some protein reserves were used, whereas males relied heavily on their fat reserves during the same period. This is probably a consequence of the long and costly migration between the last staging area and the breeding grounds.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feeding Ecology of Nesting Greater Snow GeeseThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1993
- Dynamics of fat and protein reserves during winter and spring migration in greater snow geeseCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1992
- Optimal Fat Loads in Migrating Birds: A Test of the Time-Minimization HypothesisThe American Naturalist, 1992
- The Role of Nutrient Reserves in Limiting Waterfowl ReproductionOrnithological Applications, 1991
- Energy Dynamics, Foraging Ecology, and Behavior of Prenesting Greater White-Fronted GeeseThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1991
- Protein Reserves during Staging in Greater Snow GeeseOrnithological Applications, 1984
- Spring Accumulation of Fat by Greater Snow Geese in Two Staging HabitatsOrnithological Applications, 1984
- Body Weight and Composition Changes and Adaptations for Breeding in Wood DucksOrnithological Applications, 1982
- The breeding behaviour of the pink-footed goose: Behavioural correlates of nesting successAnimal Behaviour, 1977
- Gut Morphology of Mallards in Relation to Diet QualityThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1975