Dimensionality of Rotter's I-E Scale in Sri Lanka
- 1 December 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Vol. 12 (4) , 473-479
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022181124007
Abstract
Research on Rotter's I-E Scale has shown that the scale does not measure a unidimensional trait. It is also argued that differences in the populations to which this scale is administered affect the factor structure obtained. The present study examines the structure of locus of control when applied to a sample of school-going adolescents in an urban region in Sri Lanka. A two-factor structure consisting of "Fatalism" and "Powerlessness" dimensions supports the claim for multidimensionality of the concept. It also supports Nagelschmidt and Jakob's (1977) argument that there are cultural differences in the way in which societies respond, especially in an East-West context.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Personality Differences among Blacks in Jamaica and the United StatesJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1979
- Dimensionality of Rotter's I-E Scale in a Society in the Process of ModernizationJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1977
- Becoming ModernPublished by Harvard University Press ,1974
- Sex and cultural differences in perceived locus of control among students in five countries.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974
- Locus of control in university students from Eastern and Western societies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974
- Dimensions of Internal‐External Locus of Control and the Women's Liberation MovementJournal of Social Issues, 1972
- Review of the Internal-External Control Construct as a Personality VariablePsychological Reports, 1971
- Dimensions of internal versus external control.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970
- Internal‐External Control in the Motivational Dynamics of Negro Youth*Journal of Social Issues, 1969
- Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 1966