Barriers Against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for Studies of Science, Technology, and Society (STS
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Vol. 15 (1) , 105-119
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500110
Abstract
Interdisciplinary work is intractable because the search for knowledge in different fields entails different interests, and thereby different values too; and the different possibilities of knowledge about different subjects also lead to different epistemologies. Thus differ ences among practitioners of the various disciplines are pervasive and aptly described as cultural ones, and interdisciplinary work requires transcending unconscious habits of thought. The more those unconscious habits are explicated and the more we under stand how the disparate characteristics of the various intellectual cultures are related to the necessarily different interests, values, and epistemologies, the more feasible becomes the goal of transcending thought habits. Two sorts of interdisciplinary effort seem to have been successful: specific, delimited problems have been solved by teams in what is actually multidisciplinary rather than interdisciplinary work, and new disciplines have sprung up at the intersections of existing ones. STS fits neither of those patterns. Can it nevertheless be viable?Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Whigs, prigs and historians of scienceNature, 1987
- Gradual Dinosaur Extinction and Simultaneous Ungulate Radiation in the Hell Creek FormationScience, 1986
- The Attack on Mead: Margaret Mead and Samoa . The Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth. Derek Freeman. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1983. xviii, 380 pp., illus., + plates. $20.Science, 1983
- Interdisciplinary Education: A Continuing ExperimentScience, 1977