Public Relations Roles, Intraorganizational Power, and Encroachment
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Public Relations Research
- Vol. 4 (2) , 61-80
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0402_01
Abstract
Encroachment occurs in public relations when professionals with expertise in such fields as marketing, law, human resources, or engineering occupy the senior public relations position in an organization. When encroachment occurs, public relations frequently becomes little more than a technical support function servicing other units of the organization—rather than a central management function in itself. I explored the idea that encroachment does not result so much from outsiders grabbing the turf of public relations as from weaknesses of public relations practitioners themselves. I used a systematic sample of 166 public relations practitioners in the United States to test the idea that public relations manager role aspirations and competencies and the schema held regarding the public relations function explains the extent to which encroachment takes place. Results suggest that managerial aspirations and competencies and the belief that public relations is a powerful organizational function decrease the li...This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The concept of powerBehavioral Science, 2007
- Conceptual differences in public relations and marketing: The case of health-care organizationsPublic Relations Review, 1991
- Public relations numbers are up but stature downPublic Relations Review, 1988
- Knowledge and Skills Required by Public Relations EmployersPublic Relations Review, 1987
- Advancement for public relations role modelsPublic Relations Review, 1986
- Program evaluation and the roles of practitionersPublic Relations Review, 1984
- A comparison of sex roles in public relationsPublic Relations Review, 1982
- Management's view of the future of public relationsPublic Relations Review, 1981
- Testing the practitioner's impact on clientsPublic Relations Review, 1979
- Individual Differences in Certain Aspects of the Level of AspirationThe American Journal of Psychology, 1935