Deleterious Effects of Increased Body Weight Associated with Intensive Insulin Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes: Increased Blood Pressure and Worsened Lipid Profile Partially Negate Improvements in Life Expectancy
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 20 (sup1) , S67-S73
- https://doi.org/10.1185/030079904x2033
Abstract
Objective: Weight gain is an unwanted side effect of improved glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes, associated with increased blood pressure (BP) and worsening lipid profiles. While improved glycaemic control per se should improve long-term patient outcomes, increases in BP and worsening lipid profiles may counteract these benefits. The aim of this modelling study was to assess whether the increased body weight and associated worsening of lipid profile and blood pressure would negate the improvements in glycaemic control seen with intensive therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes. Methods: A validated diabetes model projected life expectancy (LE), quality-adjusted LE (QALE) and total lifetime costs of complications in type 1 diabetes cohorts with the characteristics of patients from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The following four cohorts (A–D) were created based on increased body weight under either conventional or intensive therapy: A) conventional glycaemic control in the subgroup with lowest weight-gain quartile after 6.5 years (HbA1c increased by 11% from baseline); B) conventional control in the highest weight-gain quartile (no change in HbA1c from baseline); C) intensive control in the lowest quartile of weight gain (with 16.1% decrease in HbA1c, but no increase in weight or associated BP, and improved lipid profile); D) intensive control in the highest quartile of weight gain (with 21% decrease in HbA1c, increased systolic BP of 6 mmHg, and worsened lipid profile). Data were derived from DCCT and other published sources. Results: Intensive control, even with weight gain, led to major improvements in LE and QALE, and reduction in costs of complications versus conventional therapy. Intensive therapy with no weight increase led to a higher LE (increased by 0.57 years) and higher QALE (increased by 0.28 years) and lower costs of complications (reduced by $523/patient), compared to intensive therapy with the highest quartile of weight gain. Conclusions: Concerns about weight gain should not deter intensive insulin therapy. However, the value of improving glycaemic control without increasing body weight (and associated increased BP and worsening of lipid profile) has been confirmed.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The CORE Diabetes Model: Projecting Long-term Clinical Outcomes, Costs and Costeffectiveness of Interventions in Diabetes Mellitus (Types 1 and 2) to Support Clinical and Reimbursement Decision-makingCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2004
- Validation of the CORE Diabetes Model Against Epidemiological and Clinical StudiesCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2004
- UKPDS 60Stroke, 2002
- The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56)Clinical Science, 2001
- Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational studyBMJ, 2000
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34)The Lancet, 1998
- Effect of Excessive Weight Gain With Intensive Therapy of Type 1 Diabetes on Lipid Levels and Blood PressureJAMA, 1998
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Weight Gain Associated With Intensive Therapy in the Diabetes Control and Complications TrialDiabetes Care, 1988