Should We Be Teaching More History?
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Theory & Research in Social Education
- Vol. 18 (1) , 53-60
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1990.10505604
Abstract
Since the middle of the 1980s, there has arisen a social studies reform movement. The most striking common feature of this movement has been the call for an increase in the amount of history incorporated in social studies programs. Although the reformers do not speak with one voice, they are united in the emphasis they place on the role of history in the curriculum. In this article, I question whether the reforms are well-founded. More specifically, will the incorporation of more history improve social studies programs? Is curriculum reform the most urgent need in social studies education? Should we expect widespread change in how social studies is taught?Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Can Children Learn from History?Childhood Education, 1987
- Elementary Students' Perceptions of Social StudiesThe Social Studies, 1984
- The Usefulness of Educational Research in Curricular/Instructional Decision-Making in Social StudiesTheory & Research in Social Education, 1979
- Teacher Behavior in the Elementary School Social StudiesTheory & Research in Social Education, 1977
- The New Social StudiesThe bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 1967